3-D Printed space maintainers - A review Review Article

Main Article Content

Noureen A Afritha
Sharanya
Joyson Moses

Abstract

Although the idea of a digital workflow is not new in dentistry, it has just recently started to be applied in pediatric dentistry. Fabrication of space maintainer is a time-consuming procedure that needs constant communication with the laboratory to be receive and provide patients the best outcomes. These devices maintain space created by premature tooth loss so that the erupting permanent teeth will not experience any kind of malocclusion As a result of clinician's natural curiosity 3-D printed space maintainer have been developed. The advanced CAD/CAM technology used for fabricating digital space maintainers improves patient experience and compliance. The current paper provides an insight on available conventional space maintainers and various aspects of technologically advanced digitainers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Afritha, . N. A., Sharanya, & Moses, J. . (2022). 3-D Printed space maintainers - A review: Review Article. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation, 7(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjpedorehab.v7i2.578
Section
Articles

References

Rao AK, Sarkar S. Changes in the arch length following premature loss of deciduous molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1999 Mar;17(1):29-32. PMID: 10863487.

Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space maintainers in dentistry: past to present. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2402-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6604.3539. Epub 2013 Oct 5. PMID: 24298544; PMCID: PMC3843386.

MENEGAZ, Aryane Marques et al. Effectiveness of space maintainers in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review. []. , 20, 2, pp. 252-257. ISSN 1413-4012.

Albati M, Showlag R, Akili A, Hanafiyyah H, AlNashri H, Aladwani W, et al. Space maintainers application, indication and complications. Int J Community Med Public Health 2018;5:xxx-x

Dhanotra KG, Bhatia R. Digitainers-Digital Space Maintainers: A Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S69-S75. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2040. PMID: 35082471; PMCID: PMC8754270.

Graber TM. Orthodontics principles and practice. 3rd edn. WB Saunders; 1998.

Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;41(8):612-8. PMID: 24073500.

Chalakkal P, Ferreira AN, Da Costa GC, Aras MA. Functional Lingual Arch with Hinge-type Lockable Dentulous Component. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):302-308.

Maurya R, Singh H, Kapoor P, Sharma P, Niranjan B, Dubey A. Winged nance palatal arch: An adjunct to tooth movement. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;39(1):104-105. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_408_20. PMID: 33885397.

Kupietzky A, Tal E. The transpalatal arch: an alternative to the Nance appliance for space maintenance. Pediatr Dent. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):235-8. PMID: 17688021.

Maurya R, Singh H, Kapoor P, Sharma P, Niranjan B, Dubey A. Winged nance palatal arch: An adjunct to tooth movement. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;39(1):104-105. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_408_20. PMID: 33885397.

Gitarani Hazarika Bora, Meghali Langthasa and Swarga Jyoti Das. 2020. “Space maintainers: a boon in preventive orthodontics”, International Journal of Current Research, 12, (10), 14537-14541.

Agarwal T, Agarwal N. A Modified Removable Space Maintainer for Compromised Dentition of Children: A Case Series. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):722–724.

Christensen JR, Fields HW. In: Pediatric dentistry – infancy through adolescence. 5th edn., Casamassimo SP, Fields HW, McTigue DJ, et al., editors. St. Louise, MO: Elsevier Inc.; 2013. Space maintenance in the primary dentition. p. 379.

Feasby WH, Ecclestone ER, Grainger RM. Nickel sensitivity in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 1988 Jun;10(2):127-9. PMID: 3269521.

Baroni C, Franchini A, Rimondini L. Survival of different types of space maintainers. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16(5):360–361.

Chandra H, Krishnamoorthy S, Johnson J, et al. ILL effects of conventional band and loop space maintainers: time to revolutionise. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2018;4(1):1–3. doi: 10.15713/ins.idmjar.83

Singh P, Cox S. Nance palatal arch: a cautionary tale. J Orthod. 2009 Dec;36(4):272-6. doi: 10.1179/14653120723301. PMID: 19934245.

Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):267-72. PMID: 9783298.

Almuzian, Mohammed & Alharbi, Fahad & Chung, Lucy & McIntyre, Grant. (2015). Transpalatal, Nance & lingual arch appliances: Clinical tips and applications. Orthodontic Update. 8. 92-100. 10.12968/ortu.2015.8.3.92.

Topkara A, Karaman AI, Kau CH. Apical root resorption caused by orthodontic forces: a brief review and a long-term observation. Eur J Dent 2012;

Pawar BA. Maintenance of space by innovative three-dimensional-printed band and loop space maintainer. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37:205-8.

Skirbutis G, Dzingutė A, Masiliūnaitė V, Šulcaitė G, Žilinskas J. PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. A review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(2):54-58. PMID: 30531169.

Williams D. Polyetheretherketone for long-term implantable devices. Med Device Technol. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):8, 10-1. PMID: 18348432.

Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Aug 2;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7. PMID: 32741366; PMCID: PMC7398079.

Wang L, He S, Wu X, Liang S, Mu Z, Wei J, Deng F, Deng Y, Wei S. Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties. Biomaterials. 2014 Aug;35(25):6758-75. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.085. Epub 2014 May 15. PMID: 24835045.

Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Surface properties of polyetheretherketone after different laboratory and chairside polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):419-425. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Sep 28. PMID: 27692577.

Kun J, Dinggui Z, Wei L, et al. Clinical application of digital space maintainer fabricated by polyetherketoneketone for premature loss of deciduous teeth [J/CD]. Chin J Stomatol. 2019;13:368–372.

Guo H, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Computer-aided design of polyetheretherketone for application to removable pediatric space maintainers. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1) doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01184-6.

Soni HK. Application of CAD-CAM for Fabrication of Metal-Free Band and Loop Space Maintainer. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):ZD14-ZD16. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23459.9246. Epub 2017 Feb 1. PMID: 28384989; PMCID: PMC5376843.

What is BruxZir Solid Zirconia? View Technical Information. [Internet]. BruxZir. 2021. https://bruxzir.com/technical-information [cited 19 February 2021]

TriLor® | Techno-Polymer Framework - Harvest Dental Products https://harvestdental.com/trilor/

Bechir F, Bataga SM, Tohati A, Ungureanu E, Cotrut CM, Bechir ES, Suciu M, Vranceanu DM. Evaluation of the Behavior of Two CAD/CAM Fiber-Reinforced Composite Dental Materials by Immersion Tests. Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;14(23):7185. doi: 10.3390/ma14237185. PMID: 34885342; PMCID: PMC8658643.

Beretta M, Cirulli N. Metal free space maintainer for special needs patients. Adv Dentis Oral Health. 2017;6(2) doi: 10.19080/ADOH.2017.06.555683.

Oen, Kay T; Veitz-Keenan, Analia; Spivakovsky, Silvia; Wong, Y Jo; Bakarman, Eman; Yip, Julie (April 9, 2014). "CAD/CAM versus traditional indirect methods in the fabrication of inlays, onlays, and crowns". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011063. ISSN 1465-1858.

Fasbinder DJ. The CEREC system: 25 years of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141((suppl 2):):3S–4S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0354.

Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2015 Apr 13;7(3):57-70. PMID: 25992260; PMCID: PMC4402686.

G. Uzun (2008) An Overview of Dental CAD/CAM Systems, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 22:1, 530-535, DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2008.10817506

Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, Lu X, Shi H, Lee ES, Jiang HB. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021 Jul 17;2021:9950131. doi: 10.1155/2021/9950131. PMID: 34367410; PMCID: PMC8313360.

Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, et al. PEEK polymer in orthodontics: a pilot study on children. J Clin Exp Dent.2017;9(10):e1271–e1275. doi: 10.4317/jced.54010.

Trilor® – The most innovative technopolymer for dental prosthesis [Internet]. Dentist Channel Online. 2021. https://dentistchannel.online/2020/02/22/trilor-the-most-innovative-technopolymer-for-dental-prosthesis/ [cited 19 February 2021]

https://www.zotiondental.com/news/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-cad-cam-techno-23980003.html