A Comparative Evaluation of Pulp Tissue Dissolving Ability of Three Different Pulp Dissolving Agents With 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite: An In-Vitro Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorofacres.v7i2.903Keywords:
Pulp tissue, Pulp dissolution, Sodium hypochlorite, Pulp dissolving agents, Endodontic treatment, Irrigating solutionsAbstract
Introduction: The dissolution of pulp tissue is an essential aspect of root canal treatment, as it aids in the removal of necrotic or infected tissue from the root canal, thereby reducing the microbial load.
Aim: This in-vitro study aimed to compare the pulp tissue dissolving ability of three different pulp-dissolving agents with a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution.
Materials and Methods: 128 intact, non-carious extracted human single-rooted premolar teeth were selected and sectioned to harvest intact pulp tissue. Pulp tissue samples were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n=32) based on the pulp dissolving agent used: Group I (5.25% NaOCl solution), Group (5% Calcium hypochlorite solution), Group III (5.25% NaOCl gel) and Group IV (8% Papain gel). The initial weight of each sample was recorded and samples were exposed to specific pulp-dissolving agents for specified time intervals. The time required for complete dissolution of the pulp tissue was recorded for all samples till 120 mins.
Results: The study analyzed the mean weight of pulp tissue in various groups, including Group I, Group II, Group III, and Group IV. After 30 minutes, complete dissolution of pulp tissue was evident in Group I, while Group II showed 0.0058 grams of remaining tissue after 30 minutes, 0.0040 grams after 60 minutes, and 0.0022 grams after 120 minutes. Group III showed 0.0072 grams of remaining tissue after 30 minutes, and Group IV showed 0.0075 grams of remaining tissue after 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 120 minutes.
Conclusion: 5.25% NaOCl has the highest pulp tissue dissolution efficacy compared to other dissolving agents. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess the feasibility of these agents in clinical practice.
References
Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):256-264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73378
Patil CR, Uppin V. Effect of endodontic irrigating solutions on the microhardness and roughness of root canal dentin: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(1):22-27. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.79969
Moogi PP, Rao RN. Cleaning and shaping the root canal with an Nd: YAG laser beam: A comparative study. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(2):84-88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.66718
Chandler N, Friedlander L, Alothmani O. The anatomy of the root apex: A review and clinical considerations in endodontics. Saudi Endod J. 2013;3(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.116273
Iandolo A, Dagna A, Poggio C, Capar I, Amato A, Abdellatif D. Evaluation of the actual chlorine concentration and the required time for pulp dissolution using different sodium hypochlorite irrigating solutions. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(2):108-113. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_165_19
Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças I das N, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl 1):e65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0065
Khademi A, Usefian E, Feizianfard M. Tissue dissolving ability of several endodontic irrigants on bovine pulp tissue. Iran Endod J. 2007;2(2):65-68.
Jena A, Sahoo SK, Govind S. Root canal irrigants: a review of their interactions, benefits, and limitations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(4):256-261.
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
Sedgley C. Root canal irrigation--a historical perspective. J Hist Dent. 2004;52(2):61-65.
Abraham S, Raj JD, Venugopal M. Endodontic irrigants: A comprehensive review. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(1):5-9.
Taneja S, Mishra N, Malik S. Comparative evaluation of human pulp tissue dissolution by different concentrations of chlorine dioxide, calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(6):541-545. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.144590
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2000;26(6):331-334. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200006000-00006
Frais S, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Some factors affecting the concentration of available chlorine in commercial sources of sodium hypochlorite: Concentration of sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J. 2001;34(3):206-215. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00371.x
Johnson BR, Remeikis NA. Effective shelf-life of prepared sodium hypochlorite solution. J Endod. 1993;19(1):40-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81040-X
Estrela C, Estrela CRA, Barbin EL, Spanó JCE, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):113-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402002000200007
Mehdipour O, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28(10):544-546, 548, 550.
Dutta A, Saunders WP. Comparative evaluation of calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite on soft-tissue dissolution. J Endod. 2012;38(10):1395-1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.020
Whittaker HA, Mohler BM. The sterilization of milk bottles with calcium hypochlorite. Am J Public Health (N Y). 1912;2(4):282-287. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2.4.282
Zand V, Lotfi M, Soroush MH, Abdollahi AA, Sadeghi M, Mojadadi A. Antibacterial efficacy of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(4):315-319. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2016.11
Duarte M, Yamashita JC, Lanza P, Fraga SC, Kuga MC. Influence of endodontic irrigation with papain gel on apical sealing. Salusvita, Bauru. 2001;20(2):27-33.
Mamboya EA. Papain, a plant enzyme of biological importance: a review. Am Jrnl of Biochem and Biotech. 2012;8(2):99-104.
Couto De Oliveira G, Ferraz CS, Andrade Júnior CV, Pithon MM. Chlorhexidine gel associated with papain in pulp tissue dissolution. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(4):210-214. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.210
de Almeida LHS, Leonardo NG e. S, Gomes APN, Souza EM, Pappen FG. Influence of EDTA and dentine in tissue dissolution ability of sodium hypochlorite: Pulp Dissolution of Sodium Hypochlorite. Aust Endod J. 2015;41(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12044
Pithon MM, Lacerda-Santos R, Oliveira GC, Ferraz CS, Costa MS, Barreto MM, de Melo Silva D. Effect of different combinations of papain-based gels on dissolving pulp tissue. Biosci Jrnl. 2017;33(4):1099-1105. https://doi.org/10.14393/bj-v33n4a2017-37160
Moorer WR, Wesselink PR. Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J. 1982;15(4):187-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1982.tb01277.x
Stojicic S, Zivkovic S, Qian W, Zhang H, Haapasalo M. Tissue dissolution by sodium hypochlorite: effect of concentration, temperature, agitation, and surfactant. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1558-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.021
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ganesh Kalandar, Manoj Ramugade, Kishor Sapkale, Abrar Sayed, Sapna Sonkurla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.