Smart Phone Photography as a Reliable Adjunct in Free Flap Monitoring: An Experience from a South Indian Post-Graduate Training Institute – Original Reasearch

Original Research

Authors

  • Jawahar Anand  Assistant Professor, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SDM Craniofacial Surgery and Research Centre,  SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Constituent unit of Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
  • Nikhil Nagaraj Reader, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SDM Craniofacial Surgery and Research Centre, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Constituent unit of Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
  • Amal Suresh Assistant Professor, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SDM Craniofacial Surgery and Research Centre SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Constituent unit of Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
  • Anil Kumar Desai Professor and HOD, Department of OMFS, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital,Dharwad, Karnataka.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56501/intjcraniomaxillofacsurgrehab.2023.797

Keywords:

Oral Cancer, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Microvascular surgery, Head and Neck Oncology, Free Flap Surgery

Abstract

Objectives:

Postoperative free flap monitoring is crucial as early detection of flap compromise and intervention can substantially increase the flap survival rate. Primary observers of free flap in recovery room is different dependent on the on-duty resident in most of the teaching institutions. A standardized free flap surgical protocol and postoperative monitoring is essential in these circumstances.

Methods:

10 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction for oral cavity cancer ablative surgery using our standard patient section, pre-operative assessment, surgical protocol were included in this study. Post operatively, along with the clinical assessment of flap, smartphones were used to capture flap photos under standard lighting conditions and real time assessment was done using a WhatsApp messenger group by sending it to the operating surgeons and residents.  The photos were assessed for any colour or texture change and in case of any flap compromise, patient was taken back to operation room without any delay.

Results:

Our protocol helped in reducing the time interval between identification of the flap compromise and re-exploration, which is the one important factor for flap survival. The flap taken for re-exploration in our study group was salvaged successfully.

Conclusion:

We suggest a cost-effective, simple and less time consuming multidisciplinary free flap monitoring protocol using smart phone photography and a messenger for evaluation by the operating team and the residents would be an effective method along with clinical monitoring for substantially increasing the success of free flap salvage rates especially in a teaching institution.

References

Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007 Jun 1;119(7):2092-100.

Perng CK. Recent advances in postoperative free microvascular flap monitoring. Formos J. Surg. 2013 Oct 1;46(5):145-8.

Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ. Timing of pedicle thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1996 Dec;98(7):1230-3.

Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR, Landis JR, Yeramian P, Ingram D, Natarajan N, Benes CO, Wallemark C. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998 Sep;102(3):711-21.

Yii NW, Evans GR, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Langstein H, Chang D, Kroll SS, Wang B, Robb GL. Thrombolytic Therapy:: What Is Its Role in Free Flap Salvage?. Annals of plastic surgery. 2001 Jun 1;46(6):601-4.

Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H, Takushima A, Ebihara S, Kimata Y, Yamada A, Ueda K, Ichioka S, Cordeiro PV. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 2003;19(06):363-8.

Brown JS, Devine JC, Magennis P, Sillifant P, Rogers SN, Vaughan ED. Factors that influence the outcome of salvage in free tissue transfer. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003 Feb 1;41(1):16-20.

Devine JC, Potter LA, Magennis P, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. Flap monitoring after head and neck reconstruction: evaluating an observation protocol. J Wound Care 2001;10:525-529.

Varkey P, Tan NC, Girotto R, Tang WR, Liu YT, Chen HC. A picture speaks a thousand words: the use of digital photography and the Internet as a cost-effective tool in monitoring free flaps. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2008 Jan 1;60(1):45-8.

Murphy Jr RX, Bain MA, Wasser TE, Wilson E, Okunski WJ. The reliability of digital imaging in the remote assessment of wounds: defining a standard. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2006 Apr 1;56(4):431-6.

Kim HM, Lowery JC, Hamill JB, et al. Accuracy of a web-based system for monitoring chronic wounds. Telemed J E Health. 2003; 9:129 –140.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Jawahar Anand , Nikhil Nagaraj, Amal Suresh, & Anil Kumar Desai. (2023). Smart Phone Photography as a Reliable Adjunct in Free Flap Monitoring: An Experience from a South Indian Post-Graduate Training Institute – Original Reasearch: Original Research. International Journal of Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery and Rehabilitation, 7. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjcraniomaxillofacsurgrehab.2023.797